Become a part of the community. Register and take part in all the features the site has to offer.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 02-06-2012, 09:30 AM #1
    jaykay
    jaykay is offline
    Premium Member jaykay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,406

    Default Olympus OM-D review

    This blog has an excellent review of the Olly OM-D
    http://blog.mingthein.com/2012/06/02/omd/

    NIKON     D200, D3, D7100 NIKKOR DX 18-70, 18-200VR, 35 f/1.8 NIKKOR FX 14-24, 24-120 f/4, 50 f/1.8, 70-200VRII, 70-300VR, AF-S 80-400VR, 500VR SIGMA 50-500 OS FUJIFILM X100s
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-06-2012, 09:13 PM #2
    nidri
    nidri is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    JHB
    Age
    38
    Posts
    110

    Default Re: Olympus OM-D review

    Thanks for the link.
    The fact that this reviewer is a such a good photographer, actually makes the write-up a lot more meaningful.
    I think that's just one (of many) reasons why I find it so hard to take Ken Rockwell seriously.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 27-08-2012, 07:22 PM #3
    James Voortman
    James Voortman is offline
    Frequent Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kloof KZN
    Age
    48
    Posts
    420

    Default Re: Olympus OM-D review

    Wow that guy can shoot! Thanks for the link.
    JamesV
    ==================================================
    D800, D300, 105G VR macro, 18-35D-AF, 24-120 f4 VR, 80-400 VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules
>