Become a part of the community. Register and take part in all the features the site has to offer.
-
Frequent Member
WB card question
Setting a custom WB with a 135 lens means that in order to fill the viewfinder it is impossible to maintain focus.
Options?
Use a wider lens to fill the viewfinder and have the card in focus then change to 135 and continue.
or shoot the card oof as it makes no difference.
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
OOF makes no difference for WB.
-
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
Thanks for clearing that up for me
-
Member
Re: WB card question
Why not get one of the WB filters?
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
Decided to shoot RAW and set to 5200K, I am happy with it.
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
 Originally Posted by Ryan Drummond
Decided to shoot RAW and set to 5200K, I am happy with it.
Sorry - but this will work out in the midday sun. If you move into shade, artificial light, fluorescent lit scenes and flash your WB will be OUT.
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
isnt it easier to use a whibal card and just let the model /or yourself hold it in the first shot,(no need to fill the frame with it , you just need it visible somewhere in the first shot) and then just take a reading in photoshop and adjust all photos taken in the same setting/light afterwards to the correct white balance? the cards start @ us$20,95.
Last edited by HeinrichR; 24-03-2010 at 10:26 PM.
-
Member
Re: WB card question
If you shoot RAW, then WB is irrelevant because you adjust it afterwards in post-processing - using, amongst other things, the histogram. Getting WB right on the camera is only necessary when shooting straight to JPEG - and even then it isn't that important, as you can still adjust it afterwards.
Otherwise, get a WB filter.
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
 Originally Posted by Sella174
If you shoot RAW, then WB is irrelevant because you adjust it afterwards in post-processing -
Yes, and No.... Allegedly, if you set your WB to 2000 and shoot a scene that's 10000, you won't have the leeway to correct it, as the data in the file is apparently skewed so far that sufficient correction cannot be done. Not done it myself.
-
Member
Re: WB card question
Ah, then apparently RAW isn't really "raw" sensor data.
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
 Originally Posted by trevori
Yes, and No.... Allegedly, if you set your WB to 2000 and shoot a scene that's 10000, you won't have the leeway to correct it, as the data in the file is apparently skewed so far that sufficient correction cannot be done. Not done it myself.
I am not so sure about this, can you supply a source for the information.
Riaan van den Berg (Pixel Arrie)
PixelArrie.co.za
__________________
Digital Asset Management / Lightroom v3 and 4/ RAW development workshops in Strand
__________________
(I came, I saw, I left my mark I cannot revisit all images critiqued by me, so I'll assume you said thanx, For questions/comments please e-mail or PM me.)
Test your LCD monitor now !!!! http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/ | Photographic Society of South Africa: www.pssa.co.za | Pretoria Wireless User Group: www.ptawug.co.za
-
Frequent Member
Last edited by Andrew Roos; 25-03-2010 at 05:31 PM.
-
Frequent Member
Re: WB card question
 Originally Posted by markthomas
I work differently. I have set my camera to a Manual white balance of 5200 and leave it there permanently. This means colours change as they should - ie red skies at stay red instead of the camera compensating for them.  Obviously I can change it later.
To Quote a friend, we all had. I should add, I shoot 5200K under studio conditions that I work in. (School halls) In other situations I shoot RAW and AWB
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|